THE CAMPAIGN FOR THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF AMERICAN BASES (CAAB)


return to Latest News menu

CAAB Report No. 112
 
Northampton Magistrates' Court
R v Lindis Percy
Alleged offence of s.68 'aggravated trespass' Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
26 March 2003 at USAF Croughton Northants.
 
SENTENCE RULING
 
 
We returned to court for DJ Richard Holland to sentence Lindis after he had found her  guilty of section 68 'aggravated trespass' (Criminal Justice and Public Order 1994) on Friday 12 December 2003.
 
Suraj Minocha (CPS Solicitor who had not been present in court or conducted the case) made an application for costs of £2,000 and also for £1,078 which was the cost of flying Ms Van West (US security personnel at USAF Croughton) over from Guam for the retrial of Lindis.
 
Richard Holland seemed somewhat surprised at the second application and commented that it was usual to apply for costs in full and not make a separate application beyond this. 
 
Raza Hussein (Defence Barrister) said that it was beond belief that the CPS had had the 'temerity' to ask for costs after the way this case had been managed.  The conduct of this case by the CPS was extremely serious (refer to reports on all four days:  www.caab.org.uk). 
 
It was 'staggering' that costs had been applied for Ms Van West's flight and he reminded the court that if the CPS had conducted their case as per the standard procedures there would have been no second trial.  The DJ commented that he had 'some sympathy' for the Defence. 
 
The CPS had allowed the American authorities to 'redact' the Manual which was handed to the DJ at both trials (we had asked for 11 items to be disclosed long before the start of the first trial) and this was 'unprecedented'.
 
He also said that there had been no adequate explanation as to the crucial omissions in Sergeant Terry's statement.  There had been no apology to either the court or the defence by this police officer or the CPS.  There were a number of occasions when the conduct of the CPS was 'well short of adequate'.
 
Lindis was also in breach of a conditional discharge imposed by Scarborough Magistrates' Court in February 2003 (an incident at Fylingdales - refer to CAAB website).
 
Summing up and giving his ruling Richard Holland said that Lindis had committed a 'serious offence'.  He went on to say that Lindis had been remanded to Holloway for one week and that he would not therefore consider a custodial sentence.
 
The DJ said that Lindis was 'always peaceful, non-aggressive and principled'.  There had been 'no hostile' act by Lindis.  She was was committed and that she had 'an abiding feeling re the US authorites'. He said that community service was not an option because of the 'seriousness of this offence'.
 
Richard Holland ordered costs against Lindis of £100, £50 for breaching the conditional discharge and a fine of £200 for the offence (reminder:  the CPS had applied for costs of £3,078).
 
We will refrain from any further comment as to the conduct of Peter Blair, Sarah Bennett and the CPS until this case is finally resolved.
 
Once again thank you so much to all Ffriends who supported Raza and Lindis in court today and for the previous four days in court.   It was enormously helpful and encouraging that so many people came and so much appreciated.
 
Anni Rainbow and Lindis Percy
Joint Co-ordinators 
CAMPAIGN FOR THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF AMERICAN BASES (CAAB)
8 Park Row, Otley, West Yorkshire, LS21 1HQ, England, U.K.
Tel/fax no: +44 (0)1943 466405 0R +44 (0)1482 702033
 
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world: indeed it's the only thing that ever does."     Margaret Mead

 

return to Latest News menu